<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 AFL Round Two Wrap up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up</link>
	<description>Expert Weekly AFL Tips, AFL Round wrap ups, Dream Team info &#38; tips on how to play and understand AFL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn</title>
		<link>http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/?p=939#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should stay away from them then Geaghs...

Also while the Eagles looked good, they have only played two teams that were outside the top 8 last year. Lets see how they go in the next 3 games, we play St Kilda (away), Bulldogs (home) and Hawthorn (away). These games will give us a real indication of where the Eagles are at for 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should stay away from them then Geaghs&#8230;</p>
<p>Also while the Eagles looked good, they have only played two teams that were outside the top 8 last year. Lets see how they go in the next 3 games, we play St Kilda (away), Bulldogs (home) and Hawthorn (away). These games will give us a real indication of where the Eagles are at for 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geaghs</title>
		<link>http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Geaghs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/?p=939#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>I told you about West Coast Jermayn. Keep an eye on them, I reckon they will sneak in. And Carlton are looking good but back them to lose this week because I am going to watch them for the first time this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told you about West Coast Jermayn. Keep an eye on them, I reckon they will sneak in. And Carlton are looking good but back them to lose this week because I am going to watch them for the first time this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn</title>
		<link>http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/?p=939#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>- Yes although the decision against Hall was bad, his attitude and the way he sooked was even worse. The Swans just kicked a goal and he was the only player not too run over and congratulate the young man, even though he was only ~30m away...

- I think the Cats were expecting West to improve after being left out of the 2007 Grand Final but he seems to have gone backwards. Ottens is 29 so if West does not improve, they may need a new ruckman.

- The Saints did indeed expose Adelaide&#039;s rolling zone, however Hawthorn perfected it over a period of time and not just a few months like Adelaide, West Coast etc. Best attack is long kicking...

- I do agree that the rushed behind rule is a joke &amp; I have expressed my disgust several times ever since it came in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Yes although the decision against Hall was bad, his attitude and the way he sooked was even worse. The Swans just kicked a goal and he was the only player not too run over and congratulate the young man, even though he was only ~30m away&#8230;</p>
<p>- I think the Cats were expecting West to improve after being left out of the 2007 Grand Final but he seems to have gone backwards. Ottens is 29 so if West does not improve, they may need a new ruckman.</p>
<p>- The Saints did indeed expose Adelaide&#8217;s rolling zone, however Hawthorn perfected it over a period of time and not just a few months like Adelaide, West Coast etc. Best attack is long kicking&#8230;</p>
<p>- I do agree that the rushed behind rule is a joke &#038; I have expressed my disgust several times ever since it came in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig eyles</title>
		<link>http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/2009-afl-round-two-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>craig eyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kick2kick.net/afl/?p=939#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>Gee, bit harsh on Hall.  I saw that soft 50 metre penalty when a Hawks player fell over after Hall said &quot;Boo&quot;.  
Goddard is a dill.  We have &quot;Spida&quot; Everitt coming out about being offered drugs twice whilst playing.  Probably was his brother.
The Swans-Hawks game was a coin toss &amp; it fell the wrong way for me.  Should always stick to the home side.  Even their own website think the Hawks stink.  Eagles are in the wait &amp; see list.
Shaw could get suspended, but then Eddie will bring in OJ&#039;s lawyers on Wednseday.  Didn&#039;t see the others.
Cats should try Shane Mumford.  Killed them locally for Bunyip so give him another run against a lone Fraser.
Rolling zone a dead duck.  Saints beat it Friday &amp; that says it all.  The bigger issue is the rushed behind.  Dogs defender left in no mans land hoping ball would roll for a rushed behind only having it put through just before the line.  What do you do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, bit harsh on Hall.  I saw that soft 50 metre penalty when a Hawks player fell over after Hall said &#8220;Boo&#8221;.<br />
Goddard is a dill.  We have &#8220;Spida&#8221; Everitt coming out about being offered drugs twice whilst playing.  Probably was his brother.<br />
The Swans-Hawks game was a coin toss &amp; it fell the wrong way for me.  Should always stick to the home side.  Even their own website think the Hawks stink.  Eagles are in the wait &amp; see list.<br />
Shaw could get suspended, but then Eddie will bring in OJ&#8217;s lawyers on Wednseday.  Didn&#8217;t see the others.<br />
Cats should try Shane Mumford.  Killed them locally for Bunyip so give him another run against a lone Fraser.<br />
Rolling zone a dead duck.  Saints beat it Friday &amp; that says it all.  The bigger issue is the rushed behind.  Dogs defender left in no mans land hoping ball would roll for a rushed behind only having it put through just before the line.  What do you do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

